Resources · Finance
Incentive risk in DER: when programs change
Tax credits sunset, tariffs get redesigned and capacity prices reset every year. How investors separate locked value from expected value, with two case studies.
VPP Economics has no affiliation with, sponsorship from, or endorsement by any utility, aggregator, platform, or device maker named here.
The short answer
- Incentives change on a shorter clock than the assets they pay for. A battery is modeled over 15 years; most program terms run one to five years, and capacity prices reset every year.
- The change can be large and fast. California’s net billing tariff cut the average export credit for new rooftop solar by about three-quarters. PJM’s capacity price went from $28.92 to $269.92 per MW-day in one auction.
- Only part of the value is locked. In our 100 kW battery example, the federal credit, which is locked once the project is in service, is about 25% of total value. The rest depends on tariffs and program rules that can be rewritten.
- Grandfathering is the main protection. Where it exists, as with California’s 20-year legacy net metering, it’s worth more than most incentive levels. Diligence should confirm it’s written into a tariff, not just expected.
Five ways incentives change
A credit ends on a date
The residential clean energy credit ended for systems installed after 2025. Storage keeps the full business credit through 2033, then steps down.
The formula is rewritten
California replaced retail-rate net metering with net billing. Hawaii closed Battery Bonus and opened BYOD Plus on different terms.
A price clears somewhere new
Capacity and wholesale prices that pay DR and VPP fleets are reset by auction or market every year.
Eligibility tightens
Storage credits now require supplier documentation, with a threshold that rises every year to 2030.
Funding is withdrawn
Federal green-bank grants were frozen and litigated in 2025 and 2026, after funds had been awarded.
The money runs out
Rebates funded from a fixed budget close when it’s spent, often with little notice to projects in development.
Federal credits illustrate the first and fourth. The July 2025 tax law ended the homeowner credit after 2025 (SEIA’s summary), kept the storage credit at full value for projects starting construction through 2033, and phases it to 75% in 2034 and 50% in 2035 (Kirkland & Ellis). Storage that starts construction in 2026 must also show that at least 55% of component cost comes from suppliers that aren’t prohibited foreign entities, rising to 75% after 2029. Our Finance hub timeline maps these dates.
Case study: California net billing
California’s net billing tariff (NBT), often called NEM 3.0, applies to rooftop solar that applied to connect on or after April 15, 2023. It credits exports at the utility’s hourly avoided cost instead of the retail rate. The state solar association estimated it would cut the average export credit from about 30¢ to 8¢ per kWh, a 75% reduction (as summarized by Solar.com).
What an exported kWh earns
Average export credit for new California rooftop solar, cents per kWh.
Swipe to see the full chart →
Customers who applied before the deadline kept their original terms for 20 years from connection, and that set off a rush. The CPUC notes that about 137,000 systems were installed in a typical year, but more in 2022 and 2023 as customers raced the deadline. New residential connections at the three large utilities then fell 44% from 2023 to 2024, according to an analysis of utility data by Hyre Solar.
The rush and the drop
New residential solar connections at California’s three investor-owned utilities.
Swipe to see the full chart →
Two lessons carry over to any DER program. First, the deadline itself moves the market: LBNL found that net billing installs averaged about 8,000 a month in early 2024, lower than any month under net metering since May 2020. Second, the redesign moved value rather than eliminating it. Net billing rewards evening exports and storage, and battery attachment rose sharply. An investor holding a solar-only pipeline was hurt; one holding solar-plus-storage contracts was not.
Case study: PJM capacity prices
Demand response and VPP fleets in the PJM region earn capacity payments set by annual auctions. Those prices swing more than almost any retail incentive. The 2024/25 auction cleared at $28.92 per MW-day, the lowest in PJM history; the next cleared at $269.92, and the following three hit a price cap, according to PJM’s 2028/29 auction report.
Capacity price by delivery year
PJM base auction clearing price for the RTO, dollars per MW-day.
Swipe to see the full chart →
The price collar now limits the range through the 2029/30 delivery year (NRG’s auction summary). Without it, PJM estimates the 2028/29 auction would have cleared at $554.72. For a DER investor the lesson is timing: one developer’s comment to PJM noted that the first high-price signal arrived 15 months after its build decision, and the next two auctions were capped. A model that uses today’s capped price for 15 years assumes the collar, the market rules and the demand forecast all hold.
How long incentives are locked
Locked years versus asset life
Years an incentive or price is fixed once a customer or project qualifies.
Swipe to see the full chart →
Only legacy net metering runs longer than a battery’s model life. Hawaii’s BYOD Plus commits a battery for five years, with an upfront payment and a repayment if the customer leaves early (Hawaiian Electric’s program page). Its predecessor, Battery Bonus, is closed to new customers, and a battery moving between programs doesn’t get a second upfront payment. California’s export adder runs nine years for PG&E and SCE customers who apply by the end of 2027.
Locked value versus expected value
What’s locked in the example battery
Present value of the 100 kW battery’s three value streams at 8% over 15 years.
Swipe to see the full chart →
The credit is the only part locked on the day the battery starts operating, about 25% of total value, and even it can be recaptured for five years. Demand-charge savings depend on the tariff staying similar; Fast DR pay depends on the program continuing. Our stranded capital page tests what happens if either one changes, and in which year.
Incentive due diligence
- Is the incentive in an approved tariff, a decision or only a program manual?
- Who can change it, and with how much notice?
- Is there a written grandfathering clause and its term?
- Is there a pending docket that could reopen it?
- Begin-construction evidence and the date it locks
- Supplier cost ratio and documentation
- Recapture window and who bears it
- Change-of-law clauses in the tax equity or transfer agreement
- Commitment term and early-exit repayment
- Budget remaining and how waitlists work
- Capacity price collar, floor and expiry
- Performance rules that reduce pay
- Separate locked from expected value
- Run the case where the program ends at its term
- Use a capacity price below the cap after the collar ends
- Check value at the end of each grandfathering period
Method and caveats
The locked-value chart uses the 100 kW battery from our Hawaiian Electric C&I page: $19,224 a year of demand savings and $6,650 of Fast DR pay for 15 years at 8%, and a 30% federal credit on $240,000. It treats the credit as locked and both revenue streams as expected.
Export credit values are the solar association’s estimate of averages and vary by hour and utility. Connection counts are utility data compiled by a third party. PJM prices are RTO clearing prices; zones can clear higher.
Nothing here is legal, tax or investment advice. Program terms change; check the current tariff and program rules.
Sources
Federal credits
- SEIA fact sheet on the July 2025 tax law
- Kirkland & Ellis on credit phase-downs and recapture
- Plante Moran on storage supplier thresholds
Net metering
- CPUC net energy metering and net billing
- LBNL, tracking the impacts of NEM 3.0
- Solar.com summary of CALSSA export value estimate
- Hyre Solar analysis of utility connection data
Capacity markets
- PJM 2028/2029 auction results report
- PJM 2026/2027 auction report
- NRG summary of the 2028/29 auction and price collar
- PJM stakeholder survey responses, 2027/28 auction